| 9 | 0 | 20 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 探究改良局部麻醉下经尿道前列腺切开术治疗老年多并发症良性前列腺增生患者的安全性和有效性。方法 通过回顾性队列研究,纳入2022年6月至2024年11月于解放军联勤保障部队第九八二医院普通外科接受外科治疗的多并发症老年前列腺增生患者共195例,其中接受改良局部麻醉下手术65例(LA组),传统硬膜外麻醉下手术130例(对照组),采用倾向性匹配评分按照1∶1比例配对后两组各60例。对一般临床资料、手术相关安全性及有效性数据进行分析,计量资料组间对比采用配对样本t检验,等级资料组间对比采用配对秩和检验,计数资料组间比较采用McNemar检验。结果 两组患者基线资料可比性良好。安全性指标方面,LA组患者住院时间较对照组更短(P<0.001),两组手术时间、术中患者生命体征、VAS痛觉评分及术后不良事件比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);有效性指标方面,两组比较差异均无统计学意义[国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)改善P=0.817,最大尿流率(Qmax)改善P=0.950]。结论 改良局部麻醉下经尿道前列腺切开术对于老年多并发症良性前列腺增生患者是安全有效的,并且由于麻醉方式的改变,对于患者基础疾病情况更为宽容,术后快速康复出院,有利于患者更安全、便捷地接受手术治疗。
Abstract:Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and 195 elderly BPH patients with multiple comorbidities who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of General Surgery, the 982 nd Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army from June 2022 to November 2024 were included. Among them, 65 patients underwent surgery under modified local anesthesia(LA group) and 130 patients under traditional epidural anesthesia(control group). After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, there were 60 patients in each group. General clinical data, surgery-related safety and efficacy data were analyzed. Paired samples t-test was used for comparison of measurement data between groups, paired rank sum test for ranked data, and McNemar test for count data. Results The baseline data of the two groups were comparable. In terms of safety indicators, the length of hospital stay in the LA group was significantly shorter than that in the control group(P<0.001), while there were no statistically significant differences in operation time, intraoperative vital signs of patients, Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) pain score, and postoperative adverse events between the two groups(P>0.05). In terms of efficacy indicators, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups [improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS): P=0.817; improvement in maximum urinary flow rate(Qmax): P=0.950]. Conclusion TUIP under modified local anesthesia is safe and effective for elderly BPH patients with multiple comorbidities. Due to the change in anesthesia method, it is more tolerant to patients' underlying diseases, enabling rapid postoperative recovery and discharge, which is conducive to patients receiving surgical treatment more safely and conveniently. Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of transurethral incision of the prostate(TUIP) under modified local anesthesia in the treatment of elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) and multiple comorbidities.
[1]Baboudjian M, Hashim H, Bhatt N, et al. Summary paper on underactive bladder from the european association of urology guidelines on non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms[J].Eur Urol, 2024,86(3):213-220.
[2]Kim EH, Larson JA, Andriole GL. Management of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Annu Rev Med,2016,67:137-151.
[3]Devlin CM, Simms MS, Maitland NJ. Benign prostatic hyperplasia-what do we know?[J]. BJU Int, 2021, 127(4):389-399.
[4]Franco JVA, Tesolin P, Jung JH. Update on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia and the role of minimally invasive procedures[J]. Prostate Int,2023,11(1):1-7.
[5]Gravas S, Malde S, Cornu JN, et al. From BPH to male LUTS:a 20-year journey of the EAU guidelines[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis,2024,27(1):48-53.
[6]周大鹏,史有为,曹天予,等.“三沟两弧”铥激光前列腺剜除术治疗高龄高危大体积前列腺增生[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2023,12(2):102-105.
[7]吴水晶,娄景盛.中国老年患者围手术期感染防治的麻醉专家共识[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2022, 21(12):881-887.
[8]吴美,夏露,程云,等.日间手术病房老年患者围手术期管理的证据总结[J].护士进修杂志,2021,36(18):1723-1727.
[9]刘友坦,郭荣鑫,陈向东,等.老年患者手术室外麻醉/镇静专家共识[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2023,39(6):659-662.
[10]王莹,王晓冬,邱颐,等.基于加速康复外科理念下老年髋部骨折围术期管理在临床麻醉本科教学实践中的应用[J].内蒙古医科大学学报,2023,45(S1):36-38.
[11]兰孝达,韩佳凝,姜瑞,等.高龄患者接受经尿道前列腺增生手术后围术期并发症的危险因素分析[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2025,14(1):38-45.
[12]尹文利,李双辉,李永禄,等.膀胱造瘘术联合改良尿道腔内剜除术治疗老年前列腺增生疗效分析[J].局解手术学杂志,2020,29(2):111-115.
[13]徐永秀,谢晓连,杜惠贞.膀胱功能综合训练应用于老年永久性膀胱造瘘术后长期留置尿管患者的效果[J].智慧健康,2022,8(14):140-142,145.
[14]孔梅,张东,班晓辉,等.远程延续护理在老年膀胱造瘘病人中的应用效果[J].循证护理,2025,11(17):3638-3642.
[15]Saint S, Trautner BW, Fowler KE, et al. A multicenter study of patient-reported infectious and noninfectious complications associated with indwelling urethral catheters[J]. JAMA Intern Med,2018,178(8):1078-1085.
[16]於佶,张晓波,罗成斌,等.高危BPH患者局部麻醉下行TURP的体会[J].新医学,2014,45(7):477-480.
[17]周汇栋,黎汝琦,钱晓辉,等.B超引导经会阴局麻下经尿道前列腺双波长激光汽化术的疗效观察[J].中国内镜杂志,2021,27(10):72-77.
[18]Daryanto B, Suryanullah WS, Putra PYP. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia:A meta-analysis of 13 randomized control trials[J]. Curr Urol,2025,19(1):6-16.
[19]Dong HJ, Lu Y, Zhang NZ, et al. Clinical evaluation of the multifunctional suprapubic catheter in patients requiring permanent suprapubic cystostomy:A prospective randomised trial in a single centre[J]. J Clin Nurs,2019,28(13-14):2499-2505.
[20]李敏,栗云雁,韩爱玲.对接受永久性膀胱造瘘术后的患者进行家庭参与式护理的效果探析[J].当代医药论丛,2019,17(5):273-274.
[21]刘佳,李雪梅,陈晓梅,等.老年良性前列腺增生手术患者感知医患沟通质量现状及影响因素[J].护理学杂志,2025,40(3):1-5.
[22]彭海艳,谢艳娇,汤利萍,等.回授法联合微信健康教育对永久性膀胱造瘘患者生活质量的影响[J].实用临床医学,2024,25(1):83-86.
[23]邵长富,于乐广,吴育栋,等.不同手术方式治疗小体积前列腺增生的网状meta分析[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2023,38(10):748-754.
[24]张乐,李新强.椎管麻醉后并发硬膜外血肿一例[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2023,55(6):767-769.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2025.06.008
中图分类号:R699.8
引用信息:
[1]郭乃超,左世栋,董宇豪,等.老年多并发症患者改良局部麻醉下经尿道前列腺切开术治疗的临床研究[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2025,14(06):402-406.DOI:10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2025.06.008.
基金信息:
联勤保障部队第九八二医院院内课题(DJBE2023-002)