nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 04, v.14 238-244
一次性输尿管软镜联合可弯曲负压吸引鞘钬激光碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗2~3 cm上尿路结石的疗效与安全性的Meta分析
基金项目(Foundation): 国家重点研发计划(2021YFC2009300); 河北省医学科学研究课题计划(20231967)
邮箱(Email): huozhongchaogyp@163.com;
DOI: 10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2025.04.005
摘要:

目的:比较一次性输尿管软镜联合可弯曲负压吸引鞘钬激光碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石取石术(PCNL)治疗上尿路结石(2~3 cm)的疗效与安全性。方法:检索2010年1月至2025年2月国内外有关一次性输尿管软镜联合可弯曲负压吸引鞘钬激光碎石术(联合组)与PCNL(PCNL组)治疗上尿路结石的临床研究,按Cochrane系统评价方法提取资料,采用RevMan5.6统计软件对两组手术时间、结石清除率、总并发症、术后发热、术后血红蛋白下降幅度、出血量及住院时间等指标进行Meta分析。结果:Meta分析最终纳入7篇中文研究,共计994例患者(联合组538例,PCNL组456例)。两组手术时间(MD=6.43,95%CI:-6.56~19.42,P=0.33)和结石清除率(OR=1.24,95%CI:0.50~3.05,P=0.65)比较差异无统计学意义;与PCNL组相比,联合组总并发症发生率更低(MD=0.33,95%CI:0.23~0.48,P<0.001)、术后发热发生率更低(OR=0.54,95%CI:0.30~1.00,P=0.05)、术后血红蛋白下降幅度更小(MD=-4.28,95%CI:-6.83~-1.73,P=0.001)、出血量更少(MD=-9.98,95%CI:-10.78~-9.19,P<0.001)及住院时间更短(MD=-2.25,95%CI:-3.21~-1.30,P<0.001)。结论:两组手术方式在手术时间和结石清除方面效果相似。与PCNL相比,可弯曲负压吸引鞘联合输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术在术后发热、住院时间、出血量、总并发症发生率及血红蛋白下降幅度等方面具有明显优势。

Abstract:

Methods: Clinical studies on single-use flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy combined with flexible negative pressure aspiration sheath(combined group) versus PCNL(PCNL group) for upper urinary tract calculi, published from January 2010 to February 2025 at home and abroad, were retrieved. Data were extracted according to the Cochrane systematic review method, and Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.6 statistical software to compare indicators such as operation time, stone clearance rate, total complications, postoperative fever, postoperative hemoglobin decline, blood loss, and hospital stay between the two groups. Results: A total of 7 Chinese studies involving 994 patients(538 in the combined group and 456 in the PCNL group) were finally included in the Meta-analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in operation time(MD=6.43,95%CI:-6.56 to 19.42,P=0.33) or stone clearance rate(OR=1.24,95%CI:0.50 to 3.05,P=0.65) between the two groups. Compared with the PCNL group, the combined group had a lower incidence of total complications(MD=0.33,95%CI:0.23 to 0.48,P<0.001), a lower incidence of postoperative fever(OR=0.54,95%CI:0.30 to 1.00,P=0.05), a smaller postoperative hemoglobin decline(MD=-4.28,95%CI:-6.83 to-1.73,P=0.001), less blood loss(MD=-9.98,95%CI:-10.78 to-9.19,P<0.001), and a shorter hospital stay(MD=-2.25,95%CI:-3.21 to-1.30,P<0.001). Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of single-use flexible ureteroscope combined with flexible negative pressure aspiration sheath in holmium laser lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) for upper urinary tract calculi(2–3 cm). Conclusion: The two surgical methods have similar effects in terms of operation time and stone clearance. Compared with PCNL, flexible negative pressure aspiration sheath combined with flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy has obvious advantages in postoperative fever, hospital stay, blood loss, total complication rate, and hemoglobin decline.

参考文献

[1]吴阶平.吴阶平泌尿外科学[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2004:811.

[2] Guo Y, Yang L, Xu X, et al. Clinical comparative study of standard channel percutaneous nephroscope combined with flexible ureteroscope and traditional standard channel combined with microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of multiple renal calculi without hydronephrosis[J]. Pak J Med Sci,2022,38(7):1844-1851.

[3]王文斌.经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗多发性肾结石的效果[J].中国现代药物应用,2021,15(6):81-83.

[4] Wang L, Zhou Z, Gao P, et al. Comparison of traditional and suctioning ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal calculi[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg,2024,409(1):81.

[5]李天,盛明,李逊,等.输尿管负压吸引鞘在输尿管软镜碎石术中的价值探讨[J].中国内镜杂志,2018,24(2):33-37.

[6] Lee KH, Kuo HC. Recovery of voiding efficiency and bladder function in male patients with non-neurogenic detrusor underactivity after transurethral bladder outlet surgery[J]. Urology,2019,123:235-241.

[7]王则宇,高小峰.输尿管软镜争议问题的探讨[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2021,10(1):1-5.

[8]朱进,刘康,周毅彬,等.末端可弯负压吸引鞘联合输尿管软镜碎石术治疗肾结石的疗效观察[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2024,13(10):309-312.

[9] Fayad MK, Fahmy O, Abulazayem KM, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal pelvic stone more than 2 centimeters:a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Urolithiasis, 2022, 50(1):113-117.

[10]陈斌,白培德.负压技术在输尿管镜治疗上尿路结石应用的中国专家共识(2023年)[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2023,38(8):565-568.

[11]吴小将,田文俊,郑达闻,等.可弯曲负压吸引鞘联合输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗直径2~3 cm上尿路结石的临床研究[J].中华全科医学,2023,21(9):1516-1519.

[12]庄承霖,庄宝均,吕继宗,等.头端可弯曲负压吸引鞘、常规鞘输尿管软镜手术与经皮肾镜治疗>2 cm上尿路结石的疗效比较[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2024,29(10):875-879.

[13]谢恩杰,吴杰民,黄毅彬.输尿管软镜联合可弯曲负压吸引鞘治疗直径2~3cm肾结石的疗效观察[J].黑龙江医学,2024,48(23):2854-2856

[14]唐庆来,王杜渐,柳发德,等.可弯曲负压吸引鞘联合一次性输尿管软镜碎石术治疗2~3 cm上尿路结石的疗效[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2024,29(10):859-864.

[15]欧阳威,赵俊,张文元,等.经皮肾镜取石术与可弯曲负压吸引工作鞘联合输尿管软镜碎石术在肾结石(≥1.3 cm)患者治疗中的效果对比[J].中国医学创新,2024, 21(29):114-118.

[16]林剑峰,叶志彬,胡力仁,等.可弯曲负压鞘联合一次性输尿管软镜与超微经皮肾镜治疗2~3 cm肾结石的疗效比较[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2024,29(7):617-626.

[17]李武学,许长宝,赵兴华,等.一次性输尿管软镜应用可弯曲负压外鞘治疗2~3 cm肾结石的临床观察[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2024,39(4):292-295.

[18] Lopes-júnior LC, Bomfim E, Olson K, et al. Effectiveness of hospital clowns for symptom management in paediatrics:systematicreview of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials[J].BMJ,2020,371:m4290.

[19] Crocker TF, Lam N, Jord?o M, et al. Risk-of-bias assessment using Cochrane's revised tool for randomized trials(RoB 2)was useful but challenging and resource-intensive:observations from a systematic review[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2023, 161:39-45.

[20] Ying Z, Dong H, Li C, et al. Efficacy analysis of tip-flexible suction access sheath during flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for unilateral upper urinary tract calculi[J]. World J Urol, 2024,42(1):1-9.

[21]胡力仁,范先明,林剑锋,等.可弯曲负压吸引鞘联合输尿管软镜治疗2-3cm上尿路结石[J].中国微创外科杂志,2022,22(9):763-766.

[22] Cui D, Ma Q, Xie S, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of two adjustable negative pressure ureteral access sheaths combined with flex ureteroscopy for≤2 cm renal stones[J]. Sci Rep,2024,14(1):4745.

[23]蔡奕川,黄耀林,洪英洽.输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗2~3 cm肾结石的疗效及安全性比较[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2023,43(2):200-203.

[24]方荣金,黄一亮,李超,等.输尿管软镜与经皮肾穿刺微通道输尿管镜治疗单发2.0~2.5 cm肾结石疗效比较[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2023,12(6):149-153.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2025.04.005

中图分类号:R699

引用信息:

[1]霍仲超,程海峰,何泳志,等.一次性输尿管软镜联合可弯曲负压吸引鞘钬激光碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗2~3 cm上尿路结石的疗效与安全性的Meta分析[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2025,14(04):238-244.DOI:10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2025.04.005.

基金信息:

国家重点研发计划(2021YFC2009300); 河北省医学科学研究课题计划(20231967)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文